Avast rescue disk failed software#

All these post-rescue conditions were recorded in the lab individually in the tables. In the worst case, a protection application or tool would fail to detect a malware threat. There was potential for innocuous file remnants or even dangerous components from the attacker. This enabled the testers to quickly discover whether or not the system was 100 percent rescued and cleaned. 830 instances, the rescued Windows system was compared bit by bit with the previous back-up of a reference system. The third test with the special tools was carried out only on already infected systems, as this always involves bootable rescue CDs, DVDs or USB sticks with their own operating system, usually Linux-based.ДЇollowing each individual test, i.e. This procedure recreates the situation where malware initially has gone undetected and is now only noticed after the fact.

Avast rescue disk failed software#

Finally, the protection software was reactivated. The lab then copied a malware sample onto the system and launched it.

In the first test, the protection packages were installed after a (single) attack, and the experts examined whether the malware, with all its dangerous and harmless components, had been removed.Дuring the second test, a protection package was installed, then briefly deactivated. In an endurance test, the laboratory vetted the protection packages and tools in various real-life scenarios: The experts evaluated 7 protection packages and 5 special tools in more than 830 individual tests. The sophisticated laboratory test was conducted from January to December 2018 in 4 major test rounds. Afterwards, the lab examined whether Internet security suites or special tools could liquidate the intruders and restore the systems to a clean and secure condition. In the laboratory, every user's worst nightmare occurred hundredfold: Windows is overrun by malware that becomes embedded in the system.